A Lady of Letters and Cream Cracker under the Settee by Alan Bennett Es

A Lady of Letters and Cream Cracker low the Settee by Alan Bennett The two monologues I am going to be writing about argon two elderlywomen who are lonely and pin down in their own homes. I will be talkingabout how Doris, one lady from Cream cracker under the settee andIrene, the other lady in Lady of letters are suffering fromloneliness.Doris and Irene both live alone. They dont seem to have any specialfriends. For example, Irene doesnt identical being people calling herIrene. People who come across Irene essential call her Miss.Ruddock nobodyhas called her Irene since her mother died. Only real friends may callMiss Ruddock Irene.But both Doris and Irene have people who do you look out for them likethe policeman who calls in to check on Doris from time to time.Both monologues are talking, and looking directly into the camera, atmany different angles. This gives a great effect, as the persontalking in the monologue seems to be talking to YOU, in theaudience.In the monologues the women mainly talk about the past and bycomparing the twenty-four hour period they were kiddies to the days of today. This ishow monologues are a locoweed different to dramas. Monologues are aninteresting way for the people in the audience to see the opinions andthoughts of another person, maybe fourth-year or maybe younger.Both these monologues dont have a grouped name such as, action,horror or comedy notwithstanding if I had to catorgise these monologues, I would show they are real life tragedys.There are the little side comments which the author for bothmonologues, Bennett, has made to make the make the audience giggle butthe whereas the individuals in the monologue, in this case Doris orIrene, arent aware that whate... ...the Settee my emotions stayed practically thesame all the way through the monologue, as for Lady of Letter I felta number of emotions for Irene, Happy, angry, sad. I felt a lot ofsympathy for Doris when she was talking about her family but i feel nosympathy for Irene. As I said, my feelings stayed the same for Dorisbut I did feel frustrated at times, as it is frustrating when youknow whats best for someone but that someone doesnt understand. Myfeelings varied a huge criterion for Irene mainly because Irenesfeelings varied an amount.Both monologue were encouraging in there own ways. Cream crackerunder the settee did get a bit tedious at times and sometimes made mewant to fall asleep due to the same tone of voice droning on and on. Ihad a lot more to write about for Lady of Letters because I thoughtthere was a much better story line.

Essay --

Throughout history there learn been several radical events which have ultimately affected large groups of the human population, if not the world in its entirety. The events of World War II are without question a part of that inclining of radical events. Lasting approximately six years, this global war went from unprovoked acts of military invasion, to acts of mass genocide, to utilization of suicide bombers, and even the first appearance and lend singleself of atomic weapons. While its not hard to understand why the events in this war, or really any war or large descale battle, can be considered radical in nature, it is also not uncommon to also question whether certain effects were or were not ethical 1. For instance, it has often been questioned whether the united States decision to drop two nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was ethical or not. While many people may struggle with the realization of the import of these events, to me the answer is quite clear. The United States utilization of nuclear weapons against Japan during WWII was neither necessary nor ethical.Before any rational discussion or analysis on the topic can be formally begun, I believe it is of relative importance to clarify exactly what is meant by the word ethical. Ethics can nigh be defined as the moral principles and standards that govern peoples, or groups of peoples, behavior, thoughts and general way of thinking. This means that when one deems an event or action as ethical or unethical one is not simply deciding if said event was right or wrong 1. Ethical labeling implies that one has taken the general mindset of the society in which they consider themselves a part of as well as their own personal feelings, thoughts and opini... ...us that while the U.S. did not intend to formally enter the conflicts of the time, it was the actions taken by the Japanese that caused us to declare war. History also tells us that the Japanese didnt stand a candidate against the U.S. and its coordinated efforts with allies. The fact still remains that the Second World War was ended with the utilization of nuclear weapons against two Japanese cities. Asking if the attacks were necessary, majority of what is at present known says no. Asking if the attacks were right or wrong, the simple fact is I believe it was wrong for the U.S. to implement that kind of attack on populations that were mainly composed of noncombatant civilians. Between one, let alone two, atomic weapons not being necessary and it being obvious how inhumane and wrong the attacks were, there is no question in my mind that the events simply werent ethical

An Essay on Telephone Marketing :: essays research papers

An essay on squall marketingIssues surrounding telephone marketing can never be over analysed. There are party factors which influenced the development of telephone marketing. Cited by many as the single more or less important influence on post modern micro eco compartmentalism, telephone marketing is featuring more and more in the ideals of the young and upwardly mobile. Inevitably feelings miss deep amongst the aristocracy, trapped by their infamous history. Relax, sit back and gasp as I display the rich tapestries of telephone marketing. Social Factors As Reflected in classical mythology society is complicated. The immortal and indispensable phrase honesty is the best policy 1 created a monster which society has been attempting to tame ever since. Much has been state about the influence of the media on telephone marketing. Observers claim it is crunchy on the outside but soft in the middle. Our post-literate society, more than ever before, relies upon telephone marketing. To put it simply, slew like telephone marketing. Economic Factors We no longer live in a world which barters Ill give you three cows for that hat, its lovely. Our existance is a multiplication which cries Hat - $20. Of course, telephone marketing fits perfectly into the Custard-Not-Mustard model of economics. Inflation telephone marketing It is apparent from the graph that the influence of telephone marketing is strong. What is the secret to its strength? unconstipated a child could work out that inflation has always depended upon telephone marketing to a certain extent, but now more that ever. In the miniature of this free trade must be examined. Political Factors No man is an island, but what of politics? Comparing the electoral politics of most Western and easterly European countries is like comparing pre and post war views of telephone marketing.Let us consider the words of that silver tongued orator, the uncompromising Vatusia Shandy A man must have his cake and eat it in orde r to justify his actions. 2 He was first introduced to telephone marketing by his mother.

Snow Writing :: Writing Nature Writers Essays

Snow Writing When this project first came to my attention, I purview long and hard about what I would use to write and write on. I was sure I could come up with something creative and different. After a half hour of deep, deep thought, I came to the conclusion that I was going to take the easy way out and just write in shock with my finger. I was ashamed, but it needed to be done. Its hard to imagine walking up to a large open field in the jaundice cold to write or read the latest Hunter S. Thompson book, an issue of The Onion, or this very paper. In fact, it would be downright stupid. Yet, this was the technology that I drive to use. After writing the lengthy demonstration piece (I wrote Demo), it became abundantly clear that the process which writing technology has undergone has been nothing short of spectacular. The first discover of the process is to understand that not only do you need to make a writing tool, but something to use the tool on. There are dickens things that someone needs to take into account when doing this 1) permanence and 2) portability. Each rival each other in importance and both are vital to the process. We must(prenominal) first look at the pros and cons of each part of the equation the snow and the finger. Starting with what was written on - the snow - you must look at what it does mountain pass to you. First of all, snow is abundant in certain areas. From about Ohio and up the United States is covered in the stuff for a good few months a year. However, the drawback is that the snow is far from permanent. With the onset of warmer weather, the master works of the season would be lost forever. Snow has a natural fluidity to it which makes it easier to write in. It is as well as this fluidity of the snow that also causes the major problem in snow writing the bunching of snow.

Oedipus Tyrannos by Sophocles Essay -- Oedipus Tyrannos Sophocles Essa

Oedipus Tyrannos by SophoclesSophocles uses a mixture of both visual and emotional imagery to create the morally questioning, Greek tragedy Oedipus Tyrannos. He presents the audience with an desirous drama, which addresses the reality and importance of the gods that the Greeks fervently believed in. The play in like valetner forces the audience to ask themselves if there is such a concept as fate. From the very beginning of Oedipus, it is do clear that his destiny be one of fate and worse. The irony is that Oedipus unknowingly repeatedly predicts his own fate It was I who called down these curses on that mankind. Oedipus has unconsciously married his mother and killed his father, just as the Oracle predicted. Fate is proven to be unavoidable to Oedipus as the play shows a devout belief in the Greek gods. The paragons are seen as both protectors and punishers, who can turn fate back away. The gods are shown to have male monarch over everything and everyone, and whoever ignores them will be cursed by the darts no one escapes. Oedipus is one of these people who is seen to have ignored the gods warnings and therefore has brought a curse upon himself, and all those around him energy grows in the earth, nothing in the wombs of the women. With the idea of fate comes the question of fairness. Does Oedipus deserve his pitiful destiny and if it was so pre-decided then why? It was yet again the paragons office staffs.It may be difficult to avoid pitying Oedipus, as despite his obvious sins, he is shown to be a respectable and honest man I bear more pain for the people than for my own soul. Sophocles uses irony to increase your growing pity for Oedipus as he searches for the abomination that is short to be revealed as none other than himself That man must reveal himself to me. Oedipus is frantic to find the killer of Laios (his real father) so as to save the metropolis from the hateful plague that the gods have brought upon them. When Oedipus gouges out his own eyes, the difference between visual sight and insight is clearly represented Light, let this be the get time I look on you. Oedipus cannot bear to see the destruction that he has brought upon his family. Would the sight of my children have been pleasant? he asks himself, now left in the depths of shame. Due to the severe punishment that Oedipus inflicts upon himself it makes it difficult for one ... ...time to pass judgement on himself by first gauging out his own eyes, Ranting, they would not see what criminal he was suffering, what monstrous he was doing, and by then ordering his people to Expel me from this land as quickly as you can. Oedipus sense of dignity also swiftly disappears toward the end of the play, but he manages to redeem himself by accepting all blame for his actions and does not even attempt to pass it on to mortal else. He could have blamed anyone from his parents, the servant that saved him as a baby and even the Oracle, but he does not. He shows great cou rage when he says My evils are mine and will affect no one but me. Oedipus goes from a man who has unquestionable and perhaps a dangerous amount of power to a man who himself relinquishes all rule of his land to live a life of misery that he feels he deserves. The gods and fate play a abundant role in creating the tragedy, but Sophocles leaves it up to the audience to pass final judgement on Oedipus. There is a definite moral to this play and that is no one can ever know their decided fate until they die, for How can we say anyone is happy until he has crossed to the other side without suffering? Oedipus Tyrannos by Sophocles Essay -- Oedipus Tyrannos Sophocles EssaOedipus Tyrannos by SophoclesSophocles uses a mixture of both visual and emotional imagery to create the morally questioning, Greek tragedy Oedipus Tyrannos. He presents the audience with an trigger-happy drama, which addresses the reality and importance of the gods that the Greeks fervently believed in . The play also forces the audience to ask themselves if there is such a concept as fate. From the very beginning of Oedipus, it is make clear that his destiny be one of fate and worse. The irony is that Oedipus unknowingly repeatedly predicts his own fate It was I who called down these curses on that man. Oedipus has unconsciously married his mother and killed his father, just as the Oracle predicted. Fate is proven to be unavoidable to Oedipus as the play shows a devout belief in the Greek gods. The Gods are seen as both protectors and punishers, who can turn fate back away. The gods are shown to have power over everything and everyone, and whoever ignores them will be cursed by the darts no one escapes. Oedipus is one of these people who is seen to have ignored the gods warnings and therefore has brought a curse upon himself, and all those around him cipher grows in the earth, nothing in the wombs of the women. With the idea of fate comes the question of fairness. Does Oedipus d eserve his pitiful destiny and if it was so pre-decided then why? It was yet again the Gods powers.It may be difficult to avoid pitying Oedipus, as despite his obvious sins, he is shown to be a respectable and honest man I bear more pain for the people than for my own soul. Sophocles uses irony to increase your growing pity for Oedipus as he searches for the abomination that is soon to be revealed as none other than himself That man must reveal himself to me. Oedipus is frantic to find the killer of Laios (his real father) so as to save the city from the hateful plague that the gods have brought upon them. When Oedipus gouges out his own eyes, the difference between visual sight and insight is clearly represented Light, let this be the extend time I look on you. Oedipus cannot bear to see the destruction that he has brought upon his family. Would the sight of my children have been pleasant? he asks himself, now left in the depths of shame. Due to the severe punishment that Oedipus inflicts upon himself it makes it difficult for one ... ...time to pass judgement on himself by first gauging out his own eyes, Ranting, they would not see what evil he was suffering, what evil he was doing, and by then ordering his people to Expel me from this land as quickly as you can. Oedipus sense of dignity also swiftly disappears toward the end of the play, but he manages to redeem himself by accepting all blame for his actions and does not even attempt to pass it on to individual else. He could have blamed anyone from his parents, the servant that saved him as a baby and even the Oracle, but he does not. He shows great courage when he says My evils are mine and will affect no one but me. Oedipus goes from a man who has unquestionable and perhaps a dangerous amount of power to a man who himself relinquishes all rule of his land to live a life of misery that he feels he deserves. The gods and fate play a great role in creating the tragedy, but Sophocles leaves it up to the audience to pass final judgement on Oedipus. There is a definite moral to this play and that is no one can ever know their decided fate until they die, for How can we say anyone is happy until he has crossed to the other side without suffering?

Oedipus Tyrannos by Sophocles Essay -- Oedipus Tyrannos Sophocles Essa

Oedipus Tyrannos by SophoclesSophocles uses a mixture of both visual and emotional imagery to clear the morally questioning, Greek tragedy Oedipus Tyrannos. He presents the audience with an intense drama, which addresses the reality and importance of the gods that the Greeks fervently believed in. The play also forces the audience to ask themselves if there is much(prenominal) a concept as fate. From the very beginning of Oedipus, it is made clear that his passel be one of fate and worse. The irony is that Oedipus unknowingly repeatedly predicts his own fate It was I who called down these curses on that hu troopsity. Oedipus has unconsciously married his mother and killed his father, just as the Oracle predicted. Fate is proven to be undeniable to Oedipus as the play shows a devout belief in the Greek gods. The Gods are seen as both protectors and punishers, who can turn fate back forth. The gods are shown to have power over everything and everyone, and whoever ignores them wil l be cursed by the darts no one escapes. Oedipus is one of these people who is seen to have snub the gods warnings and therefore has brought a curse upon himself, and all those around him Nothing grows in the earth, nothing in the wombs of the women. With the idea of fate comes the question of fairness. Does Oedipus deserve his pitiful circumstances and if it was so pre-decided then why? It was yet again the Gods powers.It may be difficult to avoid pitying Oedipus, as despite his limpid sins, he is shown to be a respectable and honest man I bear more pain for the people than for my own soul. Sophocles uses irony to join on your growing pity for Oedipus as he searches for the abomination that is soon to be revealed as none other than himself That man must reveal himself to me. Oedipus is frantic to fetch the killer of Laios (his real father) so as to save the city from the hateful plague that the gods have brought upon them. When Oedipus gouges out his own eyes, the difference b etween visual quite a little and in cumulation is clearly represented Light, let this be the last time I look on you. Oedipus cannot bear to see the destruction that he has brought upon his family. Would the position of my children have been pleasant? he asks himself, now left in the depths of shame. Due to the severe punishment that Oedipus inflicts upon himself it makes it difficult for one ... ...time to pass judgement on himself by first gauging out his own eyes, Ranting, they would not see what evil he was suffering, what evil he was doing, and by then ordering his people to Expel me from this dirt as quickly as you can. Oedipus sense of dignity also swiftly disappears toward the end of the play, but he manages to redeem himself by accepting all strike for his actions and does not nevertheless attempt to pass it on to someone else. He could have goddamnedd anyone from his parents, the servant that saved him as a baby and as yet the Oracle, but he does not. He shows grea t courage when he says My evils are mine and will affect no one but me. Oedipus goes from a man who has unquestionable and perhaps a dangerous amount of power to a man who himself relinquishes all rule of his devour to live a life of tribulation that he feels he deserves. The gods and fate play a massive role in creating the tragedy, but Sophocles leaves it up to the audience to pass final judgement on Oedipus. There is a definite moral to this play and that is no one can ever know their decided fate until they die, for How can we say anyone is blissful until he has crossed to the other side without suffering? Oedipus Tyrannos by Sophocles Essay -- Oedipus Tyrannos Sophocles EssaOedipus Tyrannos by SophoclesSophocles uses a mixture of both visual and emotional imagery to stimulate the morally questioning, Greek tragedy Oedipus Tyrannos. He presents the audience with an intense drama, which addresses the reality and importance of the gods that the Greeks ferventl y believed in. The play also forces the audience to ask themselves if there is much(prenominal) a concept as fate. From the very beginning of Oedipus, it is made clear that his destiny be one of fate and worse. The irony is that Oedipus unknowingly repeatedly predicts his own fate It was I who called down these curses on that man. Oedipus has unconsciously married his mother and killed his father, just as the Oracle predicted. Fate is proven to be inevitable to Oedipus as the play shows a devout belief in the Greek gods. The Gods are seen as both protectors and punishers, who can turn fate back onward. The gods are shown to have power over everything and everyone, and whoever ignores them will be cursed by the darts no one escapes. Oedipus is one of these people who is seen to have treat the gods warnings and therefore has brought a curse upon himself, and all those around him Nothing grows in the earth, nothing in the wombs of the women. With the idea of fate comes the question of fairness. Does Oedipus deserve his pitiful destiny and if it was so pre-decided then why? It was yet again the Gods powers.It may be difficult to avoid pitying Oedipus, as despite his unmistakable sins, he is shown to be a respectable and honest man I bear more pain for the people than for my own soul. Sophocles uses irony to increase your growing pity for Oedipus as he searches for the abomination that is soon to be revealed as none other than himself That man must reveal himself to me. Oedipus is frantic to go through the killer of Laios (his real father) so as to save the city from the hateful plague that the gods have brought upon them. When Oedipus gouges out his own eyes, the difference between visual tidy sum and insight is clearly represented Light, let this be the last time I look on you. Oedipus cannot bear to see the destruction that he has brought upon his family. Would the sight of my children have been pleasant? he asks himself, now left in the depths of shame. Due to the severe punishment that Oedipus inflicts upon himself it makes it difficult for one ... ...time to pass judgement on himself by first gauging out his own eyes, Ranting, they would not see what evil he was suffering, what evil he was doing, and by then ordering his people to Expel me from this land as quickly as you can. Oedipus sense of dignity also swiftly disappears toward the end of the play, but he manages to redeem himself by accepting all blame for his actions and does not even attempt to pass it on to someone else. He could have blamed anyone from his parents, the servant that saved him as a baby and even the Oracle, but he does not. He shows great courage when he says My evils are mine and will affect no one but me. Oedipus goes from a man who has unquestionable and perhaps a dangerous amount of power to a man who himself relinquishes all rule of his land to live a life of bereavement that he feels he deserves. The gods and fate play a massive role in creating t he tragedy, but Sophocles leaves it up to the audience to pass final judgement on Oedipus. There is a definite moral to this play and that is no one can ever know their decided fate until they die, for How can we say anyone is sharp until he has crossed to the other side without suffering?

Night Mother Essay

Night Mother is a screenplay of a pay off who goes through a lot of problems before she at last ends up committing suicide. The woman in question is Jessie who is cast aside due to her poor rebooting skills and her epilepsy. She was deemed an unfit parent and overly a poor workforce part due to her disease. She does non meet any man and is even scared of venturing out and discovering new sights of the world. In her frustrations, Jessie ends her liveness. The culmination of events to the death of Jessie is explored in a long pepper manner. The people surrounding her each play a various role in the ultimate outcome of her life.With a keener sense of reflection it is easy for iodine to know exactly why Jessie chose suicide over life. There is so much that is left hanging and in the balance by the demise of Jessie who virtually people would want to believe could have led life differently (The Internet Movie Database). Hope and love is a theme brought out understandably in th e movie Night, Mother. The conversations that Jessie had if they had been more(prenominal) than enlightening and encouraging would have probably built her esteem towards life. Most of the talks Jessie has with her convey are redundant and undistinguished hence the preference to her sustains silence while he was alive.She loved that her father was happy with the small things and was pleased by the keenness shown to his pipe. He loved his pipe cleaned and that was his biggest bother. If clean she was dotted with her fathers love and attention (Dolan 43). However, her mother acted equal always wanted to manipulate Jessie. She barely loves Jessie and is more interested in sending her all over than in teaching her or caring for her. Her mother reveals to Jessie that she barely loved her father when she tells her how the love Jessie had for her father was enough for both of them.Yet Jessie yearns for love and affection and feels it would boost her thoughts slightly life. When her h ealth improves, and the fear of epilepsy wanes she understands finally how her life revolved around her unsoundness. She feels her mother is warrant in hating her as the sickness consumed all her meter and her mothers eon also. She bemoans losing herself to the disease and eventually confesses to her mother that she would rather take her own life for she felt she had already lost it (Demastes 53). A nonher theme that is evident is role reversal of parent and kid.With the apply of medicine Jessie starts to feel as though the sickness is imposing too much on her mother. Each season she takes medicine her memory improves and she is able to recall the effort her mother puts into her health. It makes Jessie want to make more of the matter and she is frequently questioning if her mother is enough to take care of her. With this in mind Jessie takes it in her own hands to take care of herself whenever she can. She also cares for her father a role her mother carried out previously bu t stopped when Jessie started doing it.She is at her mothers beck and call doing all that she requires yet she is the nonpareil that needs nursing and taking care of (De Fazio 72). Jessie finds more solace in helping out at home rather than trying to make friends uniform people her age. She is an isolated child, chained by the stigma that is her sickness. She readily sent and spends her time locked indoors for fear the epileptic attacks may occur during her walks outdoor. She doesnt explore to venture out of the manse and is spurned by n any nature nor adventure. She keeps to herself and no one questions her that way.She avoids conversation with most people and is seldom seen out of the house (The Internet Movie Database). There is no motivation from her mother to try and discover the world out there. She does non feel the need to do it either. The scene painted of Jessie is a bleak tale of separation from reality. What the mother feels as the prevention of pain and shame for her daughter is actually an ill that grows over time and goes unnoticed. She resents the world and her mother as a result (Brown 91). The family dynamics of this home are complex as they are depressing.The father is at comfort astute his pipes are cleans and roundhow derives gratification from this. It is like his measure of love for his daughter as he is seldom seen to display any form of unwarranted parent love or care. He just does what is needed, difference through life as though it were motions. His daughter, Jessie, on the other hand, makes it her point to clean all the pipes as she desires the attention and care shown to her by her father. She is constantly checking to see that her father is fine and at peace (Flora & Taylor 74). The relationship Jessie has with her mother is tumultuous and rocky.Her mother treats Jessie more like a house servant than her own daughter. Jessie does not seem to realize this and is seen to gladly go whenever she is sent. She feels the need t o help her mother, out of the guilt of not be able to assist her when she is unwell. She assumes most responsibilities in the house and is constantly making plans for the family like an adult. Jessie however does not entirely like her family. She complains that family usually knows too much to which her mother says it is only normal as the family rarely chooses each other and they are meant to love each other unconditionally (Flora & Taylor 116).In the life of Jessie there is recurrence of determinism and fate. Jessies mother feels that she is somewhat to blame for the way her daughter behaves and also for her sickness. She constantly question whether she might have dropped Jessie as a child or if she fed her the wrong kind of food. She confesses that she did not want any more children and she smoked and drunk while carrying Jessie awaiting conception. Jessie tries to reassure her mother saying that its just epilepsy and that there was nothing she did that would have lessened the s ituation.She is categorical in her stating that it was her fate to be epileptic and to commit suicide. She tries very hard to show her mother that the mothers decision making affects little or even nothing of her current condition. She is but a mere observer to her state for she believes either way she will die and is only trying to hasten the process (Flora & Taylor 124). A complex morality also plays a part in the develop of the story. Jessies mother finds a way to get her daughter guilty of committing suicide.She reminds Jessie of how she hates being alone or staying alone hence she feels Jessie should stay around for her. She thence tries hard to coax Jessie into shelving her plans by asking her to consider the pain incurred when talking to her friends about Jessie. It is clear that her mother felt the gap that would be left was too huge to fill. Jessie then reminds her mother that the reason she choose to confide in her about committing suicide was so that her mother would be at peace and not have to worry and question herself or blame herself for it is beyond her power to change what she feels (Dolan 105).Jessie further emphasizes the need to know for her mother was her driving force to speak. Jessie does not appreciate how her mother makes it all about her. Even after her clarification, Jessies mother is still adamant saying how she is the one whom society will continually shower with sympathy she doesnt need. She tries more cheap shots at Jessie by telling her how her son will sell all the belongings and go use drugs with that money for lack of guidance. To wish Jessie replies with an equally chiding remark that she will be happy if he found good drugs not cheaply nimble drugs (Demastes 89).From greatness to fall shows how Jessie envisioned her life with her mother. She always thought she was the prized child but in her death she realizes just how estranged she was from her parents and how she is not a suit parent to her son either. Thelma, Jessies mother, asks her to extend her stay by putting away her suicide attempt to which Jessie responds with an astute no. In her plea, Thelma promises to be a better parent and make a better listener than she usually is. Jessie is sure she knows enough not believe her mother.She says she wants a dramatic exit where she leaves at the top (The Internet Movie Database). Just by saying this Jessie shows the viewer how out of touch she is with her son. She does not even put his interests into consideration when taking her life. Asked about contacting her brother, Jessie is shocked that her mother talks to her brother and somewhat irritated. She is heard mumbling about how she had been neglected and set aside as though she was not a member of that family. She quickly defends her rift with her son as an unfortunate occurrence brought about by disease.The children in this family seem to have grown up not knowing parental love or care and consequently lost touch of their togetherness. The sudden a nnouncement of committing suicide spurns Thelma into action and for a moment she is will to spend even an extra hour with her daughter. In the frenzy she is also trying to communicate with her son Dawson and his wife Loretta (The Internet Movie Database). Even amidst the paroxysm of the realization that Jessie will eventually commit suicide the two women still find time to throw humorous statements at each other.At some point Jessie while making reference to her epileptic attacks says she did not even realize when they happened and was only alert when she woke up and found herself in a different set of clothing. She says they gave no warning and sometimes all it gave off was a light buzz to the head and her lights were out. Her mother later remarks, jokingly, that she had a splendid time watching as Jessie and her father turned on and off akin to light bulbs all through the night. They laugh at this rare moment and section glimpses of what could have been done all through their li ves (Brown, 94).To break silence Jessie is quick to point out how large her sister in-laws, feet are big and her mother counters by telling her the share a similar foot size with her in-law. Humor creates closeness and aids in filling the empty void of anger that Jessie has carried all her life (Brown, 133). The closeness and sentimentality is also seen where Jessie tells Thelma of how she wants all the night to herself. She just wants to be with her mother and no one else should disturb them. She calls the night a private moment for two.In the sentimentality there is a lot of thought provoking conversations that open the two to learning more of the other. Jessie for the first time gets to confirm that her mother lost all form of affection for her father a long time back. She is neither pleased nor sad at finally getting to hear those words uttered vocally by her mother. She also gets a half-baked confession from her mother who denies any knowledge of the suffering Jessie was going through. Jessie feels despised and takes offence that her own mother would not notice how alone she was yet she was there most of the time (Flora & Taylor 141).

Management annotated bibliography Essay

The purpose of this paper is to provide an annotated bibliography of three articles that deal with psychiatric hospital and strategic man erament. And will include a review from the authors location on current trends being shaped by blueprint and specific aspects of innovation influencing strategic management.Innovation strategy 4 key tactics of top growth companiesThe article covers the four practices of successful growth. Finding the next S-curve, lean on customers, think like a decorator, and lead the way are the four areas that are focused on. The practice of finding the next S-curve explains that innovation has a period window, and is directly related to revenue. With continuous innovation, a companys chance of hitting and staying within the window increases dramatically. The practice of lean on customers directly relates to gaining an soul of the customer. It points out tools to use, such as creating a customer empathy map. Lean on customers creates a lean approach to pro duct innovation.The think like a purposeer practice involves using innovation to create new options. This includes using Blue Ocean Strategy which is the search for uncontested market space and the business poseur tin canvas which is the nine building blocks for business. The lead the way practice involves making innovation a priority and those innovative leaders should be role models. authentic innovative companies are used as examples for each practice. These include Amazon, Apple, IBM, and Starbucks (Power, 2014-15).Elements of a successful innovation roadmapThis article covers innovation with Rapid Innovation Cycle (RIC). RIC leads to a higher success rate, by showing a repeatable process. It is anintroduction to a work shop. Product, business models, and processes can benefit from this road map. The rapid innovation cycle has four phases. Phase one is define and scope the innovation opportunity, phase two is discover new ideas, phase three develop and design concepts for exp erimentation, and phase four is demonstrate the innovation through piloting and prototyping.The define phase details the way to define and scope an innovation. This is from the customers perspective and saves valuable time and energy. The denudation phase details ways of exploring ideas to solve the issues that came to light in the define phase. The develop phase shows ways of developing the ideas that came from the discovery phase. The demonstrate phase turns the ideas from the development phase into simulations or working prototypes. By following the prescribed roadmap, companies can innovate with little to no waste (Samuel, 2013). use Global insights to drive local innovationThis article shows a strategy to gain innovation by looking at trends and insights on a orbiculate level. By learning what trends are emerging and what global consumers behaviors are, provides important insights to meet consumers needs. Two important areas to focus on are the customers experience and life style focus. The consumers overall satisfaction is a key element, and products need to fulfill a wide array of lifestyles and interests. By following and anticipating these trends, companies can focus their innovation efforts to fulfill these needs (Capercini, 2013).Authors reviewInnovation is a key factor in any business. With the information age moving and advancing as fast as it is, companies nurse to be proactive to keep up. Part of strategic management is innovation this includes having a plan, developing new ways to do business, and new or better products and services. Not paying attention to global as well as local trends could shake catastrophic consequences on a business. It is up management to lead the way and be role models. By finding uncontested market space, companies can have the advantage over competitors.ReferencesCapercini, R. (2013). Innovation Management.se. Retrieved from http//www.innovationmanagement.se/2014/10/28/using-global-insights-to-drive-local-innovat ion/ Power, D. (2014-15). Harvard division of continuing education Professional Development. Retrieved from http//www.dce.harvard.edu/professional/blog/innovation-strategy-4-key-tactics-top-growth-companies Samuel, Dr. P. (2013). Innovation Management.se. Retrieved from http//www.innovationmanagement.se/2014/11/10/elements-of-a-successful-innovation-roadmap/

Man Wildlife Conflicts

The problem of Man Elephant conflict is more severe in the districts of Hassan and Madikeri where large herds of elephants can be seen roaming and marauding the farms especially in or skinny the woods areas damaging the valuable pastoral crops. At times there feed been loss of human lives which only accentuates the problem taking this conflict to an totally new level. Naturally people can tolerate the loss of agricultural crops barely non the loss of their family members.But accordingly who is responsible for all this? It is we who have intruded into their territory, converting the forests into agricultural farms, growing crops and inviting the elephants to our doorsteps to come and have their stomach fill. Its we who have fragmented their habitat by making roads, dams and canals. We have honeycombed their habitat by our so called developmental activities eating into their homelands and this appetite of ours for their areas is only increasing day by day with the bulging huma n population.The elephants in these areas seem to have a very homophile(a) habit. First they have their stomach fill. After that they roam around in search of arrack which is usually being distilled in local bhatties. The arrack or the distil waste gives them a nice kick and these drunken elephants are responsible for the loss of human lives. The tools employed by the forest department akin bursting of crackers, gunshots or fire torches are too primitive to stop or scare outside(a) the marauding pack of drunken elephants.The Man-Leopard conflict is more conspicuous in the transition zone between ironic plain lands and the green hilly areas. In the Chikmagalur district it is more a problem in the dry taluqa of Kadur particularly b browseing villages of Kadur and Chikmagalur taluqa where the dry tract ends. Kadur is the place which earned a bad name for it about 10 years back. It was here where large number of panthers had to be shot and killed by employing and bringing so calle d sharp shooters from all over the state in search of an illusive so called man-eater panther.The end offspring of all this hunting spree was that every day and night several panthers were shot and brought to the post mortem table, post mortem was carried out and the killed panther was declared innocent as no human remains could be detected inside till finally some human hair remnants were detected in one and then only this shooting spree came to a halt. It is debatable whether it was really required to kill such a large number of panthers which is an endangered species but mayhap the department had no means to identify the rrant panther and hence large number of panthers had to be killed in search of that illusive wayward one. Moreover at times one is driven by the urge to be seen as trying his best. Probably this urge opened the floodgates and gradually people took the legality into their confess hands sound offing that why to wait for the forest department when they can thems elves teach panthers a lesson. Same happened some time back. A family of a bring forth panther and its two grown up cubs was seen in the vicinity of a village.They hunted a calf and ate it partially before they were chased away by the villagers. Once they left, the carcass of the calf was nicely poisoned. When the mother and the cub returned unsuspectingly next day, they consumed the remains and in the process died themselves. Leopards by nature be to stray into the habitations in search of their kill. Their natural prey is becoming rare in the forests and the omnipresent cows and dogs in the vicinity of the villages on the periphery of forest brings them in close conflict of the human beings.In some other areas also few panthers have had to lose their lives being caught in the snares. These snares are fixed in the barbed wire fence of coffee estates, not necessarily by the estate owners but at times by their labour in order to catch wild boars or smaller animals. However it is t he panthers and Sambars who have had to pay the price with their lives for their adventure in to the estates. The Man- Tiger conflicts are by and large cut back to the high forests and the coffee estates in the vicinity of forests in Chikmagalur district.These conflicts also arise due to depredation by tigers on the cattle or getting mire in the snares fixed in the fencings of the estates. Few tigers have been killed due to such snares. In Chikmagalur, Hassan, Kodagu and other Western Ghat districts Coffee plantations are an integral part of the topography. The conditions useable in the coffee estates make them very close to look like forest. Presence of cattle in such areas makes them ideal hunting grounds for the tigers and leopards bringing them in direct conflict with the villagers.Moreover there are large number of authorized and unauthorized muzzle loading guns available making it very arduous for the wild life to survive. Primary reason for all these conflicts is fragmenta tion of the wild habitat. Whereas few patches have been brought to a lower place the Conservation network by declaring them as field of study Parks or Sanctuaries, about 85-90% of the forest areas are still outside this network. While there can be no doubt that establishing this network has contributed importantly to wildlife conservation. But real problem is that even these networks are also fragmented.Whereas total concentration in these parks and sanctuaries is on wildlife protection making the conditions ideal for wildlife, but what about the wildlife staying in forest areas outside these networks. Wildlife knows no boundaries. Creation of ideal conditions in sanctuaries has helped wildlife to multiply rapidly but where is the additional habitat required to run through care of the additional population of animals, which tries to flow over to the adjoining areas only to get killed. This is particularly so with regard to the wild animals having territorial tendencies.There is n eed to have a continuous conservation network with sufficient area and resources to take a shit care of the progeny. Right now almost no effort is being make to take up wild life related management works outside the parks and sanctuaries. The lands outside the parks and sanctuaries (even inside also) are constantly under threat of encroachment. Honeycombing of the forestlands has already reached extreme. The tools employed by the government in reducing the Man and Wildlife Conflicts are highly insufficient and hence not producing desired results.If we think that paying a few hundred or thousands Rupees to a person as compensation for crop damages by elephants or for a cattle killed by a leopard or tiger would save our wildlife from getting poisoned or shot, then it is nothing but our shortsightedness. Even this so-called wildlife compensation is paid to him later on making innumerable trips to the concerned office. The farmer has to forego his earnings for each day he has to visit the office, he has to pay from his pocket for the bus find fault and has to undergo physical strain .And what he gets is just few hundred rupees. Such hardships discourage him and in the process he gets encouraged to take the law into his own hands and to settle scores with his tormentor- the wildlife. There are only losers on both the sides. The Forest officials are also at times not acting in tandem. There is no coordination among the adjoining units. Particularly in case of elephant herds movements between the adjoining units it can be seen. Everybody wants to drive away the herds to other adjoining unit without giving any thought.It only complicates the problems. Need of the hour is to have a stock of the real problem. And then only solutions can be found. We tend to take each problem in a routine manner. There is a tendency to leave the things to lower subordinates. The powers that be have to take everybody into confidence, discuss the issue threadbare and then have to take a conscious decision. A conscious policy decision need not be essentially sweet and liked by all but it may herald a new era where people and wildlife both can coexist beneficially.

George Orwell’s 1984 and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 Essay

Imagine this, a complete(a) world of complete harmony and justice. there is no wrong, and in that location is no right. There is only utopia. It might be the perfect place where people want to live, or the place that people dream slightly. It might notwithstanding be the picture of the future. However, this utopian world is revealed to have flaws. It lacks umteen of the qualities of life that exist today. Thus the Utopian world isnt so Utopian any much. And the more that is revealed about the world, the more horrible it becomes. Soon, it becomes a nightm atomic number 18, a world of illusions, of lies. That is the dystopic world that authors such as Bradbury and George Orwell pictures in their books, a world that exists infra the image of utopia, and yet to the reader seems like a foreign, inhumane residence dominated by an all-powerful government.George Orwells 1984, and Ray Bradburys Fahrenheit 451 depicts two different dystopic worlds. The settings of some(prenominal) bo oks are different and the characters are unique however, both(prenominal) of these books are also very similar. 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 are similar dystopic bookss by a harsh root word of censorship in which the government withh octogenarians or censors information, by a similar thread of a totalitarian government running the dystopic world, and by a common knowledge of the truth that the suspensor and the antagonist both hold.Censorship is a remarkable simple concept the ability of the government to withhold or variety show information that passes into the public. All governments have some form of censorship, and some governments have less censorship than different(a)s. Yet censorship discharge also become a difficult concept to grasp, for censorship allows the government to influence how people think. The less censorship there is, the more people begin to think, which according to standards today, is a mature amour. However, totalitarian governments such as the ones in Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 do not want people to think. They want people to just do, and thus it becomes a perfect seemingly Utopian world that the reader interprets as a piece of dystopic literature. In Fahrenheit 451, Beatty explains, Colored people dont like atomic Black Sambo. Burn it.White people dont feel good about Uncle Toms Cabin. Burn it (pp.59). Beatty is declaring that there are galore(postnominal) minorities as well as distinct groups of people. A perfect world must satisfy all of them, so if a book comes up that soul doesnt like, burn it. However, burning is a permanentprocess. A burned book cannot be recovered. Thus, as more books are burned, more history, information is organism erased. Peoples minds begin to dull from lack of reading and in the end people accept the fact that the government controls them and their actions. Similarly, a quote from 1984 explains, The messages he had received referred to articles or news items which for one reason or another it was th ought necessary to alter, orrectifyIt was therefore necessary to rewrite a paragraph of enceinte Brothers speech (38, 39).In this quote, Winston works in the Ministry of Truth to change the information that reaches the public. This is also censorship in tell apart to keep the proles, the majority of the population, ignorant. By changing the information, there is no proof that people have against the validity of the government, and therefore people are sedated. In a similar way to Fahrenheit 451, the people come to gradually accepting the censored documents that reach them. They could hook on one fact one day, and the completely opposite word fact another. Thus when the two books of dystopic literature are compared, the similar motif of censorship can be seen to play a huge part in the way the world runs. The government utilizes censorship while the common people accept it. When the reader sees this, it imparts a sense datum of horror in the seemingly Utopian world, and thus mak es the two pieces of literature dystopic.Another aspect that connects the two pieces of literature together is the idea of a totalitarian government ruling the people. In both works, the government creates the sense of a utopian world. The idea is that the government rules every aspect of the peoples lives, and that is the only way for a utopia to exist. This way of thinking is also twisted in a sense, because totalitarian governments do not care for the well being of its people. The people who rule only want power. That is why the reader realizes that the piece of literature is dystopic. In Fahrenheit 451, the totalitarian government controls the police, mechanical hounds, and the firemen.The firemen act under the wishes of the government to burn peoples books. An business relationship of the firemen is revealed in Beattys quote, there was no longer need of firemen for the old purposes. They were given the new trade, as custodians of out peace of mind, the focus of our understa ndable and rightful(prenominal) dread of being inferior official censors, judges, and executors.Thats you, Montag, and thats me (58, 59). Beatty is explaining the reason that governments created firemen to burn books. The government can censor information that the public receives with the creation of the firemen, and it is the job to the people and the firemen to do their duties without question. That illustrates the totalitarian government in the society of Fahrenheit 451.In 1984, the totalitarian government is led by a figure, Big Brother. The inner Party and the Outer Party are also part of the totalitarian government, only consisting of 15% of the population of Oceania. These people in the Inner and Outer Parties, with the exception to Winston, are devoted to Big Brother. Big Brother is the figure that holds the party and utopian society together, and the propaganda and demonstrations center around the totalitarian form of government. What is really shivery about the totalitar ian society is that when someone goes against protocol, like Winston did, he/she was not executed immediately. Instead, they are made to love the totalitarian society and show faithfulness towards it. Then they are killed. This is illustrated in the quote, He looked up again at the portrait of Big Brotherthe final, indispensable, healing change had neer happened, until this momentThe long-hoped-for sess was entering his brain He loved Big Brother (297). Winston was tortured at the Ministry of Love in order to love Big Brother. The government never killed him, and finally at the end, Winston loved Big Brother and was finally in bliss. This shows the horrors of the government. The government has total control over the people, and no one can run away from committing a crime against the government. The government will always and forever be. That is one of the reasons why the piece of literature is considered dystopic. It is also a reason why 1984 is a powerful book and serves as a inform to the readers. In conclusion, a similar aspect of both dystopic literatures is the totalitarian form of government in both. That part of government holds the Utopian society together, and it is precisely that aspect that horrifies the reader and makes both pieces of literature dystopic.A final point that both Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 have in common is that the hero as well as the antagonist who know the truth about the type ofsociety they live in. Unlike the common people, the protagonist realizes that the world they live in is not perfect. The majority of people are content with their society, but Winston, in 1984, and Montag, in Fahrenheit 451, realizes that there could be so much more in the world that they live in. Montag discovers the truth and knowledge that the burned books get. Montag shows curiosity for books by saying, There must be something in books, things we cant imagine, to make a woman interference in a burning house there must be something there. You do nt stay for nothing (51). Montag shows interest at books because he saw a woman voluntarily burn herself alongside her books.Thus he reasoned that books must contain substance. It also illustrates that Montag is a flaw to the perfect Utopian society. Even his wife shows little care for books or the fact that a woman was burned with her books. However, Montag starts to coup doeil the imperfect society he lives in. Winston is also unhappy with how the government is and especially because of how there is little or no privacy. He is driven with the dreams and hopes of a go bad place, a better government in which to live in. He demonstrates this by writing in a diary, which was against the rules of the government.He also rebels in a sense by writing in the diary, DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER (20). Another connection that is shared by Montag and Winston is that both their wives illustrated the perfect form of beings in the society. Winston correct stated that he hated his wife because she re ally didnt have a mind of her own. This showed that there were only few people in the Utopian society that realized the society and government for what it was, and that the society was terrible.The antagonists also know the truth of the world they live in. In Fahrenheit 451, the antagonist is Beatty, who has read many books himself. He is very knowledgeable and uses literature to confuse Montag. In the end, the reader gets a sense of Beatty wanting Montag to kill him in order to be vindicate of the acts he is committing and the government he is in. Beatty provokes and pushes Montag to kill him by saying, Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur, pull the trigger (119). Although it doesnt state clearly in the book that Beatty cute Montag to kill him, it is one way of viewing this matter. In a similar way, OBrien is the antagonist of 1984. During the part when he interrogated Winston, the reader learns that OBrien is reallywith Big Brother, and he has accepted the fate and results of the current government a long time ago.He even admits that he wants power and control. OBrien proves both these facts by stating, They got me a long time ago (239), and, The party seek power entirely for its own sakeIt is exactly the opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined (263, 267) OBrien admits to siding with the current totalitarian government, but also admitting that the current society is flawed and grants power to a select few, at the cost of the other 85% of the population. Thus, the two pieces of literature also share the fact that the protagonists and antagonists know the whole, or part, truth. It is these connections that bring together these two books written about dystopic literature.And to conclude, Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 are both pieces of dystopic literature. Both have many aspects in common. Although the two books are unrelated to each other in the sense of characters and the setting, both illustrate a dystopic world and give s imilar reasons and ideas about such a world. Both books illustrate how censorship can be used to control the people under the influence of the government. The books also reveal the necessity for a totalitarian government in order for the world to be a utopia and yet to the reader, dystopic.Finally, both pieces of literature show that there are flaws to this type of world to the protagonist as well as the antagonist in it. However, the way that the authors illustrate the outcome of the protagonist and antagonist is different. In George Orwells cruel dystopic world, the protagonist loses all hope and loves Big Brother at the end. In Bradburys dystopic world, Montag retains the hope that with his knowledge of books, mankind can one day dispel the cruelty and censorship of the totalitarian government.While Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 can be read and just taken as a fantasy, a book that illustrates what could have happened, but did not. However, the authors of these books did not intend the m to be simply read and discarded. What the author wants to impart to the reader is a warning. The warning is that in the future, the world that humans live in might one day mirror the world created by Bradbury or Orwell. If there is one thing for certain, it is a threat that the current world will reflect a world in Fahrenheit 451 or1984. After all, humankind is evolving with swiftness, and anything can happen. There are many televisions in the world. Only one more step to make them all interact with each other and transmit/receive images, and the telescreens in 1984 exist. Sound, which is a predominant part of the utopian world, is taking up peoples time and thoughts in the real world.With all of the MP3s and all of the other music tools that people constantly listen to, life indeed is starting to mirror the worlds of Orwell and Bradbury. Finally, people go at a quicker and faster chiliad now. Eventually, there will be a point where people have to stop and think about what is tru ly happening around them and to think about nature. If this does not happen, then indeed the world will be thrust into an unending cycle of chaos, and some may call it utopia when that happens. When a government arises to take power without the question or consent of the people, then is it utopia, or chaos and slavery?BibliographyBradbury, Ray. Fahrenheit 451. The Ballantine Publishing Group, 1953.Orwell George. 1984. New American Library, NY, 1949.

Evils of War Essay

There is no doubt that war is an evil one. It is the greatest catastrophe that can befall human beings. It brings conclusion and destruction, merciless slaughter and butchery, disease and starvation, poverty and ruin in its wake. A particularly disturbing side of modern wars is that they tend to become global so that they may engulf the entire world. But though war is an evil, we must recognize the fact that it is a necessary, inescapable evil. A glance at the past history of the world will show war has been a recurrent phenomenon in the history of nations.We have had wars of all types wars lasting for a year or so and a war lasting for hundred years. Clashes of arms have always occurred. In a world war has ways been waged. War has indeed, been such(prenominal) a marked feature of alwaysy age and period. This has come to be regarded as part of The normal life of nations. Poet and prophets have dreamt of a millennium an utopia in which war will not exist and eternal peace will reig n on earth, but these dreams have not been fulfilled.The occurrence the Second piece War however, conclusively proved that to think of an unbroken peaces to be unrealistic and that no institution or assembly can ever ensure the presence of peace. The United Nations Organisation, with all the good work that it has seen doing, is not proving as effective as was desired. A large number of wars, The most new-made ones behind the one in Vietnam, the other between India and Pakistan, or Ind-China war, Iran-Iraq war or Arab Isreal war.The fact of the matter is that, fighting is a natural instinct in peace. It is, indeed, too much to exact so many nations to live in a state of eternal peace. Besides, there will always be simple differences of option between various nations, different angle of looking at matters that have an international importance, radical difference in policy and ideology and they cannot be settled by mere discussion so that resort to war becomes very necessary in thes e cases.

A modern audience Essay

But her coupling to will is all a practical arrangement as she is good at her job and willing is a accomplished craftsman. As this partnership moves on the pair become much successful, they manage to pay back Mrs Hepworth the loan she gave then to get started and we see a more(prenominal) romantic side to Maggie as she saves a f begin from her wedding day bouquet.I thought Id press it in my bibleFor prevent sakeA factor about Maggie that would appeal to a modern audience is that she is very intelligent. She controls the accounts and organises everything at Hobsons. She taught Will to read and write, because Will was born into the lower class she was not properly educate and so he was illiterate scarce Maggie changed that by educating him herselfIll just set you a short copy, for tonight.Maggie is echt and fair, when Albert and Freddy are trying to get more money than they agreed out of Mr Hobson, she k forthwiths he cannot afford what they are asking and so she gets them down to a more realistic priceI know perfectly well what father can afford to pay, and it is not a green pounds nor anything like a thousand pounds.Maggie is also humble because she is not afraid to ask for help when she needs it. She asks Mrs Hepworth for money as her and will havent got any from their previous jobs because Hobson didnt pay Maggie and Will came from a lower class and had little pay, all to get married and start up a good lineageWeve nonrecreational back Mrs Hepworth what she lent us for our start and made a bit o brass on top o that.At the beginning of the do work Will lacked self-confidence and he was poor. He was also a victim of Hobsons exploitationWhat does she want to praise workmen to his face for?But Will is a talented craftsman and a skilled worker which is why Mrs Hepworth complimented him and asked that he spend a pennys her shoes in the futureThese are the best-made pair of boots Ive ever had. Now, youll get down my boots in future.This is a great comp liment for a working class man because they were not often praised for their work and didnt often do so well. This is a point about Will that would appeal to a modern audience.Will, like many other working class in the 1880s could not read at the start of the play but due to Maggies help he learns how to read and write. By starting up his own argument shows he is a good business man and he pays stick a style Mrs Hepworth the money back she lent the couple to get the business started.Weve paid off Mrs Hepworth what she lent us for our start.Will is from a working class background he is one of Hobsons boot hands and suffers social prejudice from Maggies sisters Alice and Vicky but now is near equal class to them but they still see him form a lower class and treat him with a lack of respectWill Mossop do you know who you are talking to?As the play progresses Wills confidence increase as he now dares to stand up to Hobson, Alice, Vicky and MaggieIll take you into partnership and give you a half share.The Audience may find Wills character comical due to his sayings Well by gumAnd make the viewers laugh. When Maggie tells Will she wants to marry him he is a bit worried at tries to back down from the proposal because he did not love her, but they get their partnership up and running and as the story continues he realises that he can learn to love and give Maggie the respect she needs to piss a successful business.From the start to the end of the play Will Mossop changes a lot. He went from working in Hobsons cellar to owning his own successful business and being married to Maggie. His main change was that he went from poverty to being a member of the working/middle class. By doing this he has made his way up the social ladder, which was very hard to do in the 19th century. Wills struggle could be compared to a dream going from rags to riches. In my opinion this would be the most important factor about Will that would appeal to a modern audience.Maggies determinat ion to make a success of hers and Willies marriage and the business that they start would make her popular with a modern audience because she did not really love Will when they were married, but she had to do something to get apart from Mr Hobson, her authoritarian father and she also managed to get her sisters married.

Life in the Trenches Essay

World War One, also kn hold as the gigantic War, was a struggle that would permute all wars. Never in the history of humanity had there been a war fought in such a manor, and it would change the way all wars that followed it were fought. World War I was expected to be a relatively short war, as those in the past had been, and a war of great battles and move workforcet. However WWI was typified by its deprivation of movement, years of stalemates and great battles that turned out to be massive slaughters where hundreds of thousands of men died for a very small further in territory.The most important aspect of WWI that made it so unique was its use of a new tactic of digging a series of connecting trenches that shape up the landscape of the Western and Eastern fronts. This use of trenches by both the Allies and the Germans was one of the primary reasons that WWI lasted as long as it did. Life in the trenches was a horrifying experience for any man who served in the Great War. The terrible conditions in the trenches would only be fully known by the semipublic after the war was over in late 1918. The armies of the Allies had strict rules against the public gaining knowledge of the details of the war and used many methods to prevent them sagacious the truth.After the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, the German army was forced to retreat. They had failed in their objective to force France into and early surr hold backer and rather than give up the land that they had gained they dug into the domain to secure their position and protect themselves from the Allie fire. Because the Germans were at an advantage of being able to fire at the Allies from below ground level because of this the Allies could non break the German trench line. It was apparent that the Germans would not be removed the Allies followed the German example and dug their own trenches. It was this event that halted movement on both sides and changed the style of warfare forever. Trenches soon stretched across the countryside and spread from the North Sea to Switzerland.Trench life soon became as mentally and physically taxing on passs as the actual fighting element of the war. Disease, rats, lice, and boredom became a part of daily life for a interchangeier in the trenches. After the war was over there were many accounts from soldiers of the appalling conditions and the amount of death that occurred in the trenches. It was estimated that up toone third of Allied casualties on the Western Front were actually sustained in the trenches . Aside from injuries caused by the enemy, disease accounted for a large amount of that total.Many accounts from soldiers of their time spent in the trenches are dominated by an emphasis on the amount of mud. Living in the trenches soldiers were rarely clean and when they were they did not stay that way for very long. Because of the lack of sanitary conditions in the trenches men suffered from many pests such as rats and frogs as wel l as more harmful things like lice and diseases like trench human stern and shell shock. The rats in the trenches became a problem for the soldiers because there was no way to avoid them or get along rid of them. A single pair of rats could experience almost 900 offspring in a year so the infestation continued throughout the war. Rats in the trenches were rumoured to have grown as large as cats on occasion, from eating or stealing scraps and feeding off the corpses of dead soldiers. Because the rats became so fearless the men in the trenches came to loathe them and often spent free time killing them and setting traps .Yet another annoying pest was the lice that continually plagued the men. Soldiers could spend up to an hour a day eager the lice off their bodies and clothes in an attempt to rid themselves of the pests but the effort was all in vain because they would only be re-infested the next day. Occasionally the men were sent to clean themselves in large baths while their c lothes were being put through delousing machines. Unfortunately, this rarely worked a fair proportion of the eggs remained in the clothes and within two or three hours of the clothes being put on again a mans body shake up had hatched them out.Because of the continuously muddy conditions the men often walked around in mud and water abouttimes covering as far up as their knees or waists. During the early part of the war over 20,000 men were treated for a condition that became known as trench foot. This was an infection of the feet caused by cold, blind drunk and unsanitary conditions. Without being able to remove wet socks or boots the feet would gradually go numb and the skin would turn red or blue. If untreated, trench foot could turn gangrenous and result inamputation. The only remedy for trench foot was for the soldiers to dry their feet and change their socks several times a day. By the end of 1915 British soldiers in the trenches had to have three pairs of socks with them an d were under orders to change their socks at least twice a day. As well as drying their feet, soldiers were told to cover their feet with soil made from whale oil.The Allies needed to make sure that there would be no additional factors that would affect the morale at home give-and-take of the conditions that the soldiers were forced to live in and the continuing stalemates would surely do that. If confidence in the war effort was diminished and the truth about the trenches was known there would be fewer new recruits and the Allies would be challenged to keep up with the Germans numbers. Most soldiers during the war chose to conceal the horrors of the trench warfare not wishing to happen upon their families to it. But those who wished to confide in family members and try to share with them their experiences were prevented from doing so by new laws that were put into place. The House of Commons passed the disaffirmation of the Realm Act on August 8th 1914 without debate .The Act g ave the government executive power to suppress criticism, imprison without trial and commandeer economic resources for the war effort. As a result all earn that the men wrote were read and censored by the junior officers. Although soldiers were encouraged to write letters to friends and family, the contents of the letters were monitored strictly by the junior officers in accordance with the new laws guidelines. Anything that disclosed information about military action would be removed to ensure that the Allies plans could not get to the Germans. The junior officers were also instructed to remove anything from the letters that discussed the conditions of the trenches or insinuated that the soldiers did not have faith in the actions that were being taken by the army. The members of parliament believed that if family members were to receive letters of that nature the morale in Britain would be effected which would affect the war effort all together.Britain and France also had problems deciding what to do about journalists who were reporting the war. in the beginning under the Defence of the Realm Act Britain put strict limitations on all reporters often preventing theirarticles from making it back to Britain from France. After complaints from the USA on how the British government was treating the situation a cabinet meeting was held to change the policy and to allow selected journalists to report the war. The British government appointed five men to be accredited war correspondents in January of 1915. These men were to remain on the Western Front but to be permitted to do so these journalists had to accept government manipulate over what they wrote. As a result of government interference even the disastrous first day of the Battle of the Somme was reported as a victory.Although some defended their actions saying that they were attempting to spare the feelings of men and women, who, have sons and husbands fighting in France most of the journalists admitted that they were deeply ashamed of what they had create verbally. After the war most of the accredited war correspondents were offered knighthoods by George V. Some agreed to accept the offer but others like Hamilton Fyfe refused seeing the knighthood as a bribe to keep quiet about the inefficiency and corruption he had witnessed during the war. Fyfe would later become a member of the Union of Democratic Control after the war, and would speak out as a strong critic of the Versailles repose Treaty .There were a few other instances of the British government preventing criticism of the war from being published. In 1916 the Clyde Workers Committee journal, called The Worker, was brought to court under the Defence of the Realm Act for an article that criticized the war. The two editors of the journal were found guilty and sent to prison, one for six months and the other for a year .Critical novels that were written during the war were prevented from being published or banned if they did make it to publication. A.T. Fitzroys Despised and Rejected, about conscientious objectors during WWI, was published in April 1918. A thousand copies were sold before the book was banned and the publisher prosecuted under the Defence of the Realm Act. Another novel, What Not A Prophetic Comedy by Rose Macaulay, which ridiculed wartime bureaucracy, was prevented from being published near the end of 1918. Instead it was not published until after the Armistice.So although the conditions for the men who fought in the First World War were horrific, the public did not realize the sacrifices that had been made for their freedom on a daily basis. The suppression of the truth by the British government is a controversial topic that is bland debated today. Whether or not the British were justified in preventing the public from knowing the truth it was inevitably disclosed after the wars conclusion. The images seen and the conditions endured plagued on many mens minds after the war was over. The G reat War, a war that was to be one of heroic battles and great movement, turned into a war remembered for its lack of movement, its number of casualties and the conditions that had to be endured. World War One changed the way all wars after it were fought, but not for the better.

The Best Cover Letter I Ever Received

The Best Cover Letter I Ever Received Harvard Business look backward David Silverman 118 PM Monday June 15, 2009 In my last post I talked about how to sack your scoop up more likely to catch the attention of a hiring manager. As a follow up, Id like to debate cover earns. Heres my basic philosophy on them dont bother. Thats because the cover letters I see usually flux into one of three categories The recap The resume in prose form. Its redundant, harder to read than the resume, and provides no additional insight.The form letter This says, essentially, Dear Sir or Madam I saw your ad in the paper and thought you capability like me. And its clearly a form letter where maybe they got my name and company right. If theyre lucky, I give still take the time to read their resume after being insulted with a form letter. The Im groundless This ones r be, and it expands on the resume of experience with some personal insights. Examples range from the merely batty (I understand batik as an art form has taught me to become both a better person and shake off manager. ) to the truly terrifying (I cast a pentagram hex and the central line pointed towards your undertaking listing. I hunch forward you will find this as comforting as I do. ) There are really only a few times to use a cover letter 1. When you know the name of the person hiring 2. When you know something about the job requirement 3. When youve been personally referred (which might include 1 and 2) Under those conditions, you can help your cause by doing some of the resume analysis for your potential spic-and-span boss. To illustrate, heres the best cover letter I ever received Dear DavidI am committal to writing in response to the opening for xxxx, which I believe may report to you. I can swirl you seven years of experience managing communications for top-tier xxxx firms, excellent project-management skills, and a great eye for detail, all of which should make me an ideal candidate for this openin g. I have attached my resume for your review and would welcome the chance to speak with you sometime. Best regards, Xxxx Xxxx Heres what I like about this cover letter Its short. It sums up the resume as it relates to the job. It asks for the job.The source of this letter took the time to think through what would be relevant to me. Instead of scattering lots of facts in hopes that one was relevant, the candidate offered up an opinion as to which experiences I should focus on. And that means the writer isnt simply showing me skills related to the job, hes showing me hell be the kind of employee who offers up solutions instead of just laying problems on my desk. What do you think? Have you ever secured a job thanks to a cover letter? Whats your view on the value or lack thereof of cover letters?

Nike Market Analysis Essay

There atomic number 18 many an(prenominal) companies go similar but not identical harvest-festivals, this is called Monopolistic competition foodstuff, and there be also many buyers that perceive differences between these products like service, features, send off and quality, so they argon entrusting to pay dissimilar prices for them. Therefore, each(prenominal) firm influences each other on the extent of the product prices or has some control everyplace some. For instance, exists different marketing tools that firms use for competition, such as stigmatiseing and personal selling to differentiate their offerings and advertising. Nike is laid at Bearverton, Oregon. The friendship was founded in 1978by Bill Bowerman and Philip Knight, named Nike and become the number one sports manufactures in the world design by Nolan Breitbarth in the 1970s.This company sells sports products worldwide. Nike sells a huge range of products, including shoes and apparel for sports activiti es like volleyball, cycling, golf, athletics, American football, tennis, combat sports, basketball and football. Nike is a company that has attained success in the market thanks to the chastity of its products and the turn backion for everyone to use its brand products that create the Nike Just Do It feeling for the competition.The proven strategy of the company is to create a consumers perception of brand influences their buying decision in sports industry by athletic expectation that is endorsed by real athletes, technique that has revolutionized the sports marketing. Nike recently teamed up with Apple Inc. to produce the Nike + product which monitors a runners performance via radio device in the shoe that communicates with the iPod nano. American brand Nike is number two in terms of name recognition among foreign consumers and is a sponsor of different players, events and sports teams, among others, and is the number one sports brand in the world. The direct competition of Nike has always been the sports brand Adidas. Adidas is a German worldwide firm that also produces different sporting goods, founded in 1949 in Herzogenaurach, Germany. Adidas market capitalization is 18.09billion, easy below the capitalization of Nike. Adidas is considered the second sports brand in the world, competing with Nike since this American company was founded. Adidas has never been able to pass or improve the figures of Nike. Adidas recently began to make very similar decisions to Nike this allows the competition to grow. Adidas decide to use marketing strategies similar to those of Nike in the moment that they decide to invest a large portion of their capital in advertising and celebrity sponsorships, the strategy employ by Nike since its inception. Adidas, after ups and downs in the market once against Nike, recently indomitable to acquire the Reebok firm, a sustitute brand of sporting goods, this decision was made in order to topple the market leader Sports, Nike, base d on a partnership.Adidas competes strongly with Nike, but Nike lighten has this kind of monopoly because it makes crack things with much less production factors than Adidas. Another example of substitute brand in the sports market is the touch sensation Puma, with a market capitalization of 3.46 Billion dollars. Puma does not compete strongly with brands like Nike or Adidas, their products are also substitutes but it does not has a wide range and variety. Similarly, Reebok products, before the firm was acquired by Adidas, were competing in the sports market with these two giant. Although often substitute products could be bettor than those of the two big firms, peck prefer the big firms products for the fact that marketing and advertising is way much better and people get carried away by the image that firms are selling them, beyond quality. Similar examples are for companies like Converse, New Balance and Under Armour, among others. Nikes market capitalization is 57.58 Billio n dollars and the company spends millions of dollars each year in promoting events, celebrities and numerous flashy ads that catch the attention of consumers and promote the culture of sport as a benefit to the world. Nike has managed to remain world leader in sports products since the 90s and even when there are many other sports brands in the world, Nike is kind of a monopoly in this market thanks to the market strategies used that have allowed this firm to place and especially, remain, well above their competitors, that is why this firm falls into the category of monopolistic competition. Nike has many strengths and weaknesses as a consolidated company in a market that is competitive by nature, as are the sports.One of its strengths is that it is a world class company that has the facility tosell their products anywhere in the world. Nike has more than 700 production factories slightly the world. Other two major strengths of the company, as already mentioned, is their catchwor d and symbol, which have allowed, through their marketing that this brand can become increasingly known. Nike is a well found company that has managed to get out of economic crises and demands, which also represents a threat to the assets of the company. Nike risk much as any brand with celebrities sponsoring by the fact that they may be involved in scandals, but it still retains its credibility as a firm around the world. Moreover, Nike is a company that is dedicated to their customers it does not disuse any part of the business and react properly to any changes in the consumer behavior by fetching steps that allow them to maintain a booster cable position in the market. This company is a leading innovator, they are always looking to offer the best and satisfy consumer tastes even when the population is different. In conclusion, consumers are always going to prefer products from companies like Nike or Adidas because they have sold them the idea that their products are at the to p of the market, and indeed, they are. Nike has an inelastic demand since the variation in the prices of their products does not affect the number of consumers that the brand has, again thanks to their marketing and advertising techniques. The countless ads that Nike publishes around the world are not specifically to adopt them, Nike have managed to create images that consumers hardly forget, innovative images.Consumers are always changing by the products they promote the more. Nike dominates and will continue to dominate the global sports market as its products are accessible and because they offer many promotions and discounts to their customers around the world, if Nike dominates this market nowadays is all thanks to its marketing beyond the quality or accessibility of its products. cite http//nikesports.wikispaces.com/FinanceThis chart demonstrates just how much of the market share for shoes Nike currently owns.http// vane.socialbakers.com//storage/www/daily-fan-growth-nike-vs. -adidas-originals-from-apr-01-2012-to-apr-30-2012.png This graph shows the ups and downs in demand for different brands of competition in the sports market fromApril 02 to April 30 that are not very different from nowadays.References1. Nike Inc. (NKE) -NYSE. ONLINE Available at http//finance.yahoo.com/q?s=NKE. Last Accessed 5/15/13.2. Dmitriy Kha. Monopolistic Competition. Available at http//mail.beaconhill.org/dkha/data/Micro%20Lectures/Lecture%2011.pdf. Last Accessed 5/14/13.3. Paige Adams, Haley Smith, Laura Freeman, Dan Lawson, Hayley Jacobs, Gage Mitchell. NIKE Industry and Company Analysis.Available at http//kimboal.ba.ttu.edu/MGT%204380%20Fall%202012/001/NIKE%20Industry%20and%20Company%20Analysis.pptx. Last Accessed 5/13/134. John B. Taylor, Akila Weerapana, (2009). Principles of Microeconomics. 6th ed. Boston, MA, U.S.A. Houghton Mifflin.5. Avinash K. Dixit, Joseph E. Stiglitz. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. Available at http//www.jstor.org/stable/18 31401. Last Accessed 5/14/13.

How the American government works Essay

In set out to understand how the Ameri after part authorities works, whiz must(prenominal) address the questions, who harnesss and for what purpose. However, the obvious answer may not be the correct one. Many may remember that those who shape are the people or perhaps politicians. In actuality, there is no definite unmarried or particular group who governs. Instead regime is a process, which involves several groups (voters, chiffonierdidates, parties, executive officials etc) who carry break through the policies of the people by bargaining, supporting, and compromising. The purpose of those who govern is to bind society in law. The Constitution provides legitimacy for the governments purpose, ensuring the rights of the people, as well as, protecting those who are governed from being dominated by those in superpower. cardinal of the most important components of the American government is democracy. Democracy is relevant to who governs beca put on it shows that one indivi dual does not govern and although the people may elect someone, the process of getting there and the process of staying there involves other institutions that proceed too much power.Democracy involves political participation, voting, and citizen participation. Thus, one can enunciate that every institution or individual governs in various ways and for different purposes. The American government follows Participatory democracy or representative democracy. The professorship is elected to serve the pursuits of the people. He represents the will of the majority, just as the title suggests. He is authorized to make decisions, but he alone does not have full control. In an rise concerning civil government, John Locke describes how a government functions. According to him, the only way a government can exist is when the people individually consent to the power of the government under majority rule. In order for a government to exist the people must submit to the government (if not ther e would be no government). The Constitution provides a similar explanation but not entirely. The Constitution creates a strategy of separate institutions (or branches) that share powers. The president makes up the executive branch. Those eligible for voting contribute to choosing the president.The Electoral College votes excessively and chooses the president. The president has certain powers like being commander in chief, making treaties, etc. However, Congress and the Courts (or the legislative and judicial branches) can check his powers. Congress can refuse to pas a bill the president wants, use impeachment powers, refusing to ratify treaties, or passing laws over the presidents veto. The Courts can also check the president by declaring to be unconstitutional. Similarly the Courts can check Congress and vice versa. Each branch uses its power to help pass policies. The question of who governs is not only limited to those who fall into the category of the three branches. some(pre nominal) institutions of influence and monetary dominance take part in the government. Many corporations govern in their have got way by funding campaigns. They use their involvement to help carry out policies that perhaps can or will benefit them.Thus, the question of who governs is vague. The Constitution focus on the 3 branches, but governing is not limited to the national government. When addressing the question to what ends or for what purpose one governs, one can say that the purpose of the government is to make decisions and laws, provide for the welfare of the people and ensure their rights. The Bill of Rights is an example of one of the purposes of the government. It states individual rights and liberties. The Constitution gives certain rights to the branches and those rights should be used for the people. Others may argue that those who govern have a special interest. It is human nature to have such instincts.However, this brings us back to the purpose of checks and balan ces and separation of powers. Governments govern for the majority because they represent these people (this doesnt mean that they always serve in the best interest of the body politic). Addressing the questions is a difficult task. The answer to the question varies based on ones perspective. However the Constitution enables us to understand what institutions govern and what powers arent entitled to those who govern and those who are governed.Bibliography. American Government Policies and Institutions Houghton Mifflin Company capital of Massachusetts 1998 Excerpts from Dahls Who Governs? John Lockes Essay Concerning Civil Government

The Yellow Wallpaper Essay English Literature Essay

During the nineteenth century, vainglorious womanishs sought to uphold themselves in an effort to get the better of the position quo of male domination, which forbade them from political assignment and rational indulgence. Furthermore, experts in the kingdom of medical specialty and scientific discipline sought to qualm the idea of feminine upwardly mobility, by observing the comparative failing of females in an effort to warrant inequality ( slam occupy 4 ) . The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman represents an flight from society s functions of adult females and recovering the independence they have lost. The storyteller, endeavoring for female individualism is invariably hindered by male domination derived from the 19th century which drives her to deplume self-destruction.In the articleWoman Sphere and Public Squ atomic number 18written by Karen Fisher Younger, she statesAmericans from this clip period defined adult female s function as domesticated and privat e, separate from the universe of public life. More than this, it was thought adult female was morally and spiritually purer exactly because she stayed off from the perverting public sphere. It was during this clip adult females s traditional domestic functions at place as married womans and female parents took on a sacred quality. And this separate domains ideology one private for adult females and the other public for counterfeit forces were perceived as changeless enactment from God. ( 43 )Ironically plenty, the political orientation of separate domains helped magnify adult females s influence in the populace, harmonizing to historiographers. Womans were viewed as more moral and spiritually sound than work forces, touting the belief that adult females were better render to lend to the overall morality of society.The storyteller, a adult female prescribed to simplicity remedy by her physician/husband John, is confined to her sleeping means, a kid s babys room with bad yellow( a) pigment and veto on the Windowss. The two Windowss that she looks out of, represents the possibilities of adult females if seen as peers by the opposite sex. The lyric poem she uses to depict her position through the first window are I can see the garden, those thick deep-shaded arbor, the exuberant antique flowers, and shrubs and gnarled trees ( 328 ) . The word picture of the garden represents society. The word cryptic show that adult females s ability has nt been brought away into the visible radiation. The 2nd 1 shows the lovely position of the bay and a small private bob, belonging to the estate ( 328 ) . The bay shows that society was unfamiliar with the abilities of adult females and the private pier shows that adult females are excluded from things in society.Following is the xanthous wallpaper. The colour yellow is looked at as stigmatize of illness or failing. The colour is rebarbative, about revolting a smouldering dirty yellow, queerly hurt by the slo w-turning sunshine, It is a dull yet lurid orange in some topographic points, a sallow sulfur shade in others ( 327 ) . This implies that adult females are the weaker of the two sexes. The storyteller s husband tells her to acquire over her disfavor of the xanthous wall paper in the room. He laughs at me so about this wallpaper At foremost he intend to repaper the room, but subsequently he verbalise that I was allowing it acquire the better of me, and that nil was worse for a nervous patient than to give elbow room to such illusions ( 327 ) . This shows that when adult females try to liberate themselves from the restrictive bonds of society, work forces oppress them and implement the thought that they are inferior.The want of the storyteller s individualism drives her to perpetrate self-destruction. She wants to leap out the window but the bars are excessively strong even to seek ( 335 ) . The bars symbolize the restrictive clasp that her married man or all work forces have on her, or all adult females in society. I ve got a rope up here that even Jennie did non happen ( 335 ) , the rope symbolizes the manner she is traveling to tweak her state of affairs. As John comes to the door and tells the storyteller to expand it, she had already locked it from the interior. In the soft parting she tells him, I ca nt, and that the key is down by the front stairss under the plantain foliage ( 335 ) . At this minute in clip she is firmly fastened by the well-hidden rope and is already strung up like all those strangled caputs behind the wallpaper ( 335 ) . John goes to recover the key, he comes back to open the door and to his surprise he faints. The horror behind all this was he put her in that room where she became imprisoned by the wallpaper.In decision, you could state that hanging herself was her signifier of flight. In a male rule society adult females during this period were suppose to be seen and non heard, and their occupation chiefly wa s to hold kids and take solicitude of the house. The storyteller had things she loved to make, but because of the clip in which she lived, those things were non what the regulations of society wanted. There comes John, and I must nock this off he hates to hold me compose a word ( 327 ) . She has her ain thoughts and ideas that she would wish to show. I rally sometimes that if I were merely good plenty to compose a small, it would alleviate the imperativeness of thoughts, and rest me ( 328 ) . The manner adult females were treated so It is so detering non to hold any advice and companionship about their work ( 328 ) . The storyteller s state of affairs could hold been avoided, if her hubby had listened to the warning marks and allowed her the little pleasances she joyful in. The parturiency of the xanthous wallpapered room allowed the mute subjugation of her life to attest and subsequently lead to her self-destruction.Plants Cited Bed Rest Would nt Make for Pioneering Fem inist. USA Today Magazine139.2777 ( 2010 ) 4-5. Print.Fisher Younger, Karen. Women s Sphere and the Public Square The Beecher Sisters quandary Over Slavery. International Congressional Journal8.2 ( 2009 ) 43-51. Print.Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. The Yellow Wallpaper. Kennedy and Gioia 325-336.Kennedy, X.J. , and Dana Gioia, eds.Literature An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing.6th Compact erectile dysfunction. New York Longman, 2010. Print

Health Care Provider: Awareness and Diversity of Faiths Essay

AbstractWithin the health business organization system of today, galore(postnominal) health c are providers are introduced to various ghostly feelings and practices by dint of caring for those patients and families from different cultures. In ordinate for competent medical treatment to be exerciseed, the health care providers must(prenominal) return into account the spectral beliefs of those in our care to deliver good and effective quality of care. This paper will examine this schoolchilds point of view on Christianity and compare it with inseparable American Spirituality, Hinduism, and Buddhistic religious views and opinions regarding mend in todays health care society.Patients cultural and spirituality must be incorporated, and considerations addressed as essential key elements to the overall health of the patient. This will provide the shell possible outcomes for the patient. An analysis and comparison of infixed American Spirituality, Hinduism and Buddhistic rel igious views on healing and mortality and will be paralleled, explored and discussed against the Christian conviction view of the aforementi unrivaledd within this paper.IntroductionProviding health care to those of different spiritual backgrounds, it is essential to recognize the religious practices and beliefs of the patient and their families. It is of terminal importance to determine the ad hoc needs that correspond with their practices and beliefs. Comprehending these beliefs will permit health care providers to set forth a conception that promotes the best possible outcomes for the patient in the end. The United States of America welcomes raft of different nationalities and faiths. With such adiversity of cultures and religions, health care providers are tasked with educating themselves concerning a multitude of faiths and corroborating the information learned with those particular religious beliefs.This allows the patient and families to receive spiritual care as well as the physical care they need. Hospitals across the country deplete now recognized the cultural diversity of those that are living in the United States and have implemented a program to the training of its employees in cultural diversity.Christian perspective on revitalizing healthChristian perspective on restorative health is based on the teachings from the parole. Those who practice this faith believe that no matter the circumstances, God can restore health. While Jesus was alive and walked upon earth, it was prove that He was indeed the Son of God by the ability He had to heal those around Him. He restored health in many different ways. Matthew 1414 (King crowd together Version), the writer of this first evangel tells its audience Jesus saw a abundant crowd and He had commiseration the crowd and restored health to the in pixilateded and debilitated. His touch restored health to the people and healed them (Matthew 929-30, King James Version). Through spoken language they were restored to health (Matthew 88, King James Version), and He made sound and whole multiple infirmities and afflictions amongst the nation (Matthew 935, King James Version).People of Christian faiths believe that God can work through gifted individuals for assistance in healing. As declared in the King James Version Bible But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a particular people that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvelous light (1 Peter 29, King James Version). Prayer is powerful and Christians are taught that healing can occur, tho if do not know hardly when this may occur. Christians do have strong faith in His power which comforts us in knowing that He has ultimate control. Christian families and the Church demander and support, the process of healing begins and ends in this place setting (James 516, King James Version). Christians believe in following Gods word by faith and free grace and generosity will be granted throughout their lives (Psalms 231-6, King James Version).Impression on restoration of healthThis students impression on restorative health from illness is one of the foundations of faith about the God of the Bible. Many stories declared in different parts of the Bible report restored health required nothing but faith. This student believes in the authority of supplication, individualized, and collectively within the congregate (a collective consciousness) and with supplication, healing has happened.Christianity and Native American Spirituality ComparedThe majority of Native Americans do believe that the Great Spirit (some Native Americans call this Great Spirit grandfather and Old Man), which is part of all creation, from the heavens to the ground with all beings put here on earth. Conception is believed to be a blessing from God by Christians. Native American Spirituality believes that a persons health is brought about through actions and interact ions they have with the spirit world and wholeness is derived from the proportionateness between the universe and the spirit world. Sickness derives from the imbalance with the spirit world and is causation of disharmony within the individual (Guidelines for Native American Indians, 2004).Christians have faith that God watches over the individual and prevents sickness from occurring. Native American Spiritual care is important through healing rituals which are performed at ceremonies and attended by family, tribe, along with a medical healer, either man or woman (Robinson, 2008). Christians have faith and pray to God that He heals those affected with sickness and diseases. If hospitalized, those of Native American Spirituality rely upon items which are considered inviolate and powered by the Great Spirit which are in possession of the patient around the measure for healing (Guidelines for Native American Indians, 2004).As stated above, a Christians faith and belief that collecti on is divine and He answers prayers for good health and healing. When death happens, those of Native American Spirituality have a firm conviction in reincarnation and return in a multitude of forms other than human (Guidelines for Native American Indians, 2004). Whereas, those of Christian faith believes that once a person expires, the soul rises to heaven, but the persons body girdle on earth.Christianity and Hinduism ComparedOldest of the world known religions is Hinduism. Hinduism is a way of spirit.Hindus worship multiple deities, but Christians only believe in a single God, who created the ethereal and temporal worlds. Hindus induct themselves ornamental clothing that have a specific religious meaning and some Christians wear specific trinkets of faith, according to different denominations. Hindus are noted to pray three times a day and depending on the denomination, Christians will attend church several times a week to only once a week. Hindus believe in reincarnation onc e death has transpired (Sharma, 2002), eyepatch Christians believe upon death, the soul ascends to heaven and the body stays on earth.Christianity and Buddhism ComparedThere was a man named Buddha, who afterwards many years of witnessing anguish which was related to old age, sickness, and death, fore sake his family. Setting out alone, his clothed was to find lifes meaning. Buddhism (Hinduism also shares this belief), believes in karma. Karma is the belief that the force produced from the actions of a person is held to continue transmigration and its ethical consequences determine the nature of the persons next existence, a continuum of rebirth life cycles. A strong belief in karma exist, where every action has a reaction and that everything happens for a reason (Guidelines for Buddhism, 2003) and a Christians faith is that God heals all those who are ill. Christians believe that everyone has one life, one soul, while reincarnation is the belief among the Buddhist.The emphasis o f the spiritual upbeat of the Buddhist spiritual well-being is the translucence of the mind by prayer along with meditation during sickness. Christians depend up His mercy to restore their health after sickness. But if they are not healed, then they are to accept His will. The Buddhist and the Christian believe health restoration is foundationally grounded in spirituality. Supplication and mediation is practiced by both faiths, but those who are of the Buddhist faith perform chanting (Numrich, 2001). As death nears, both have varying kinfolk, pastoral, ministerial and clergypersons will be summoned to the bedside. Post obitum, posthumous care is critical to the practicing Buddhist. Practitioners of Buddhism believe the incorporeal part of the individual can take up to three days, per say, to evacuate the body (Numrich, 2001). The Christian believes the nonphysical, incorporeal soul ascends to heaven while the physical, incarnate body remains.SummationThe similarities between the Na tive American Spirituality, Hindu, and Buddhist devotions include prayer, family, and clergyman or women apply during sickness and healing. The major difference between the Christian faith and the latter three is that once life ends the belief in reincarnated is paramount and the individual returns to the known world. Christians believe after death has occurred, the soul, the most dedicated part, ascends into heaven where God acts as arbiter and judges the individuals faith and deeds while on physically in the world, but the physical vessel, the body will remain behind in the physical world. The utmost importance for the spiritual health of the patient is to combine their beliefs into the plan of care. This can be accomplished with health care providers allowing the individual and kinfolk to partake in specific rituals, which will support the spiritual well-being of the individual.ReferencesGuidelines for health care providers interacting with American Indian patients and their fa milies. (2004). Retrieved from http//www.advocatehealth.com/documents/faith/CG-Native_American.pdf Guidelines for health care providers interacting with patients of the Buddhist religion and their families. (2003). Retrieved from http//www.advocatehealth.com/documents/faith/CGBuddhist.pdf Numrich, P. D. (2001). The buddhist tradition religious beliefs and healthcare decisions. Retrieved from http//www.advocatehealth.com/documents/faith/Buddhist-Tradition.pdf Robinson, B. A. (2008). Native American Spirituality beliefs of Native Americans, from the opposite to the Southwest. Retrieved from http//www.religioustolerance.org/nataspir3.htm Sharma, A. (2002). The Hindu Tradition religious beliefs and healthcare decisions. Retrieved from http//www.advocatehealth.com/documents/faith/Hindufinal.pdf